iFANN
    Rechercher sur iFANN...
    Connexion
    Accueil
    Actualités
    Vidéos
    Photos
    GIF
    Explorer
    Sondages
    Récompenses
    iFAMOUS
    Wiki
    Animé
    Salons
    Notifications
    Messages
    Favoris
    Profil
    WikiRécompensesiFAMOUSClassementsSecteursRécompenses créateursRécompenses utilisateursConditionsConfidentialitéRègles de la communautéRetrait / DMCAAideDéveloppeurs

    © 2026 iFANN

    Accueil
    Rechercher
    Messages
    Alertes
    Profil

    Publication

    Vojtech
    Vojtech@vojtech
    🏢Microsoft🏛️MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology📱Kimi K3

    Loop vs graph agents explained

    Your agent keeps forgetting everything between runs, and that's the real bottleneck. A loop-based setup gives the agent a goal and lets it figure things out, which works for fresh problems but falls apart when you repeat the same task. A graph instead structures the work as connected facts the agent moves through, so knowledge builds up instead of resetting to zero. It's more effort upfront, but you never start from nothing again. The loop forgets, the graph accumulates. That's the actual unlock: organize what you know as relationships rather than loose files, and a smaller model moving through a clean graph beats a bigger one searching through raw text. Microsoft, Stanford, and MIT all confirmed this independently. Kimi K3 fits the role: a million tokens of context can handle an entire reasoning path at once, at a third of the cost of frontier models. When a loop stops teaching you anything new, freeze it into a graph. So which one is your stack actually running?

    3w

    0 J'aime0 Je n'aime pas0 Republications0 Commentaires
    ?

    Commentaires

    Aucun commentaire pour le moment. Soyez le premier !

    Publication

    Vojtech
    Vojtech@vojtech
    🏢Microsoft🏛️MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology📱Kimi K3

    Loop vs graph agents explained

    Your agent keeps forgetting everything between runs, and that's the real bottleneck. A loop-based setup gives the agent a goal and lets it figure things out, which works for fresh problems but falls apart when you repeat the same task. A graph instead structures the work as connected facts the agent moves through, so knowledge builds up instead of resetting to zero. It's more effort upfront, but you never start from nothing again. The loop forgets, the graph accumulates. That's the actual unlock: organize what you know as relationships rather than loose files, and a smaller model moving through a clean graph beats a bigger one searching through raw text. Microsoft, Stanford, and MIT all confirmed this independently. Kimi K3 fits the role: a million tokens of context can handle an entire reasoning path at once, at a third of the cost of frontier models. When a loop stops teaching you anything new, freeze it into a graph. So which one is your stack actually running?

    3w

    0 J'aime0 Je n'aime pas0 Republications0 Commentaires
    ?

    Commentaires

    Aucun commentaire pour le moment. Soyez le premier !